The "What are you doing tonight?" Thread

[Anthrax]

Originally Posted by Addict

15 dollars for a 15-pack? That's cheap dude, it'd probably cost about 30 dollars if it was in Sweden.

Yeah they're usually a lot more expensive... I drank a full 15 pack in 3 days this week. Soooo unhealthy but yummeh

[MW4560]

I don't always drink soda, but when I do, I drink...

Coke.

[GameMasterGuy]

Vanilla coke, or vanilla coke?
u c wat i did thar?

[MW4560]

Originally Posted by GameMasterGuy

Vanilla coke, or vanilla coke?
u c wat i did thar?

I drink...

Both.

[GameMasterGuy]

Same.

[Torrentstorm]

Originally Posted by MW4560

I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or if you're serious to be honest However, since you did recommend I buy it in my N64 thread I'm going to assume you're serious...

For one, the controls are god aweful. The graphics are.... God aweful too. There's no story and, most of the game is spent flying through rings. I don't see how anyone could like it to be honest with you. But hey, if you do, more power to you.

Actually, I was being serious. I've beat the game today, I consider it a good game.

I do not agree that the controls are awful, I found them to be pretty decent. I was playing with a 360 controller though, maybe the fault is in the N64 controller. I really do agree that the graphics are god awful, but only in the actual city, I'm not sure if they intended you to pay attention to them, really, I was too busy flying through rings. The graphics are actually pretty decent on the actual levels. And I really do agree, there really isn't any story at all, but I was too busy flying through rings to care. And I did enjoy flying through those rings. Noticed you left out the music, that was actually pretty good as well.

The only problem I really found with the game was how during some missions you really don't know what to do at all. They expect you to know what to do almost. That was really ridiculous.

I guess I'm just too much of a fan of the N64 to consider Superman 64 a horrible game. I'm also the type of guy that gives Galaxy a 0/10 rating and Superman 64 a 6/10 rating.

[MW4560]

Originally Posted by Torrentstorm

Actually, I was being serious. I've beat the game today, I consider it a good game.

I do not agree that the controls are awful, I found them to be pretty decent. I was playing with a 360 controller though, maybe the fault is in the N64 controller. I really do agree that the graphics are god awful, but only in the actual city, I'm not sure if they intended you to pay attention to them, really, I was too busy flying through rings. The graphics are actually pretty decent on the actual levels. And I really do agree, there really isn't any story at all, but I was too busy flying through rings to care. And I did enjoy flying through those rings. Noticed you left out the music, that was actually pretty good as well.

The only problem I really found with the game was how during some missions you really don't know what to do at all. They expect you to know what to do almost. That was really ridiculous.

I guess I'm just too much of a fan of the N64 to consider Superman 64 a horrible game. I'm also the type of guy that gives Galaxy a 0/10 rating and Superman 64 a 6/10 rating.

I just don't understand how you could possibly think SMG is 0/10 game and Superman 64 is anything but 0/10. It makes absolutely no sense to me. I mean, sure, I'm all for differing opinions, but you can't possibly tell me that SMG doesn't do some things right. Hell, I don't even like SMG- I'm an Xbox guy, yet I will openly admit that it has impressive graphics, relatively fun gameplay, and lots of content. Superman 64 has none of this. It's just trash. I mean, I'm glad someone is able to get some enjoyment out of it, but putting it above SMG? Come on now, that's just ludicrous.

[Addict]

SMG isn't that special, really.

[Torrentstorm]

Originally Posted by MW4560

I just don't understand how you could possibly think SMG is 0/10 game and Superman 64 is anything but 0/10. It makes absolutely no sense to me. I mean, sure, I'm all for differing opinions, but you can't possibly tell me that SMG doesn't do some things right. Hell, I don't even like SMG- I'm an Xbox guy, yet I will openly admit that it has impressive graphics, relatively fun gameplay, and lots of content. Superman 64 has none of this. It's just trash. I mean, I'm glad someone is able to get some enjoyment out of it, but putting it above SMG? Come on now, that's just ludicrous.

My opinions for the more unique and fallen games usually are better than expected. I'm really not a fan of Nintendo. If I have to be absolutely serious, there is not one single thing I liked about Galaxy.

[Addict]

D: Not even Rosalina's Story?! You fiend!

[MW4560]

Originally Posted by Addict

SMG isn't that special, really.

I never said it was special- I'm not even a fan of it. I said it was a decent game, which it is. And at the very least, it's not even comparable to SM64. That's just crazy.

[Addict]

Lol, thought you meant Super Mario 64 first, I was like woot.

Also, TS dislikes SMG. TS likes SM64. When this is the case, I think it's fully acceptable to say that he finds SM64 better.

[MW4560]

Originally Posted by Addict

Lol, thought you meant Super Mario 64 first, I was like woot.

Also, TS dislikes SMG. TS likes SM64. When this is the case, I think it's fully acceptable to say that he finds SM64 better.

Well in the case of Super Mario 64, it is a superior game to Super Mario Galaxy- it's just better. However, here's the thing. While I can completely understand that he might derive more enjoyment out of Superman 64 for.....Some...Reason....It doesn't necessarily make it a better game than Galaxy. Super Man 64 is notorious as being one of the very worst games of all time, and he's essentially say it's better than a game which has been given glowing reviews all-around. It would be like saying that E.T. for Atari 2600 was better than Super Mario Bros 3. That's just not the case.

[Torrentstorm]

Originally Posted by MW4560

I never said it was special- I'm not even a fan of it. I said it was a decent game, which it is. And at the very least, it's not even comparable to SM64. That's just crazy.

I do agree, it is not at all comparable to Superman, but I do like Superman more.

Originally Posted by Addict

Lol, thought you meant Super Mario 64 first, I was like woot.

Also, TS dislikes SMG. TS likes SM64. When this is the case, I think it's fully acceptable to say that he finds SM64 better.

I did too.

Edit: I'm not sure if I'm being vague or not. I know for a fact that Galaxy is better than Superman, but I like Superman more. Personal opinion.

[Angry Ancestor]

Back on topic then...

Tonight, I'm just relaxing. I just had a basketball game, and I'm really sore from riding my bike all day.